Home > Reviews, Science > Realism in space: EUROPA REPORT and GRAVITY (spoiler reviews)

Realism in space: EUROPA REPORT and GRAVITY (spoiler reviews)

In the past few days I’ve seen two recent movies that took an unusually realistic approach to portraying spaceflight: Sebastián Cordero’s Europa Report (which I watched on my computer via Netflix) and Alfonso Cuarón’s Gravity (which I watched in the theater). It’s very rare to get two movies in such close succession that make an attempt to portray space realistically, and I hope it’s the beginning of a trend. Although both movies did compromise their realism in different ways.

Europa Report is a “found-footage” movie presented as a documentary about the first crewed expedition to Jupiter’s moon Europa to investigate hints of life. It’s rare among such movies in that not only is the found-footage format well-justified and plausibly presented, but it’s actually thematically important to the film. On the surface, the plot follows the beats of a fairly standard horror movie: characters come to an unfamiliar place, start to suspect there’s something out there in the dark, and fall prey to something unseen one by one. But what’s fascinating about it is that it doesn’t feel like horror, because these characters want to be there, are willing to risk or sacrifice their lives for the sake of knowledge, and see the discovery of something unknown in the dark as a triumph rather than a terror. And that elevates it above the formula it superficially follows. It’s really a nifty work of science fiction in that it celebrates the importance of the scientific process itself, and the value of human exploration in space even when it comes at the cost of human lives.

The depiction of the ship, its flight, the onboard procedures, and the behavior of the astronauts is all handled very believably, with a well-designed and realistic spaceship relying on rotation to create artificial gravity. The actors, including Sharlto Copley, Daniel Wu, Anamaria Marinca, Christian Camargo, House‘s Karolina Wydra, and Mission: Impossible — Ghost Protocol‘s Michael Nyqvist, are effectively naturalistic and nuanced. The film’s low budget means they can only manage a limited number of microgravity or spacewalking shots, but what we get is reasonably believable. I do have some quibbles about procedures, though, like the lack of spacesuit maneuvering units during the spacewalk, and the decision later on Europa to send one crewperson out on the surface alone without backup. Really, a lot of the bad things that happened seemed to be avoidable. But I’m willing to excuse it since this was portrayed as a private space venture and the first of its kind. Now, I’m a big supporter of private enterprise getting into the space business, since history shows that development and settlement of a frontier doesn’t really take off until private enterprise gets involved and starts making a profit from it. And I’m sure that private space ventures in real life take every safety precaution they can. But for the sake of the fiction, it’s plausible that a novice organization might let a few safety procedures slide here and there.

The one thing about the film that really bugged me is one that’s pervasive in film and TV set in space and largely unavoidable: namely, once the crew landed on Europa, they were moving around in what was clearly full Earth gravity. Europa’s gravity is 13.4 percent of Earth’s, a few percent less than the Moon’s gravity, so they should’ve been moving around like the Apollo astronauts. Unfortunately, it seems to be much harder for Hollywood to simulate low gravity than microgravity. I’ve rarely seen it done well, and all too often filmmakers or TV producers are content to assume that all surface gravity is equal. In this case I suppose it’s a forgivable break from reality given the film’s small budget, but it’s the one big disappointment in an otherwise very believable and well-researched portrayal of spaceflight. Still, it’s a minor glitch in a really excellent movie.

Gravity is a very different film, much more about visual spectacle and action. Indeed, I’d read that it definitely needed to be seen in 3D to get the full impact, so I decided to take a chance. See, nearly 30 years ago I had some laser surgery for a melanoma in my left eye, and that left my vision in that eye distorted, on top of my congenitally blurry vision in that eye. So normally my depth perception isn’t all that great, and I tend to be unable to perceive 3D images like those Magic Eye pictures that were a fad not long after my surgery. So I’ve always assumed that I wouldn’t be able to experience 3D movies. But a few years back, I talked to a friend who had similar eye problems, and he said he could occasionally get some sense of depth from a 3D movie. So for this case, I decided to give it a try. And lo and behold, it worked! I could actually perceive depth fairly normally, though mainly just when there was a considerable difference in range, like when something passed really close to the camera, or in the shots of Sandra Bullock receding into the infinite depths of space (which were the key shots where you pretty much need 3D to get the full impact). I’m not sure if someone with normal vision could perceive more than I did, but it worked pretty well, considering that I wasn’t sure if it would work at all. There were occasionally some shots where I got a double image when something bright was against black space, but the double image persisted when I closed one eye, so I think it was a matter of the glasses filtering out the second image imperfectly. Anyway, it’s nice to know I can see 3D movies (and I didn’t get a headache or nausea either), though it costs a few bucks extra, so I’ll probably use this newfound freedom judiciously — for movies where the 3D is really done well and serves a purpose, rather than just capitalizing on a fad or being sloppily tacked on.

Anyway, as for the movie itself, it’s a technical tour de force, one big ongoing special effect that uses remarkably realistic CGI to create the illusion of minutes-long unbroken shots of George Clooney and Sandra Bullock floating in space and interacting seamlessly with each other and their environs. The technical aspects of NASA procedures and equipment and so forth seem to be very realistically handled as well. And best of all, the movie states right up front in the opening text that in space there’s nothing to carry sound, and it sticks by that religiously, never giving into the temptation to use sound effects in vacuum no matter how cataclysmic things get and how many things crash or blow up. The only sounds we hear when the viewpoint astronauts are in vacuum are those that they could hear over their radios or through the fabric of their suits when they touch something. It’s utterly glorious. Every science-fiction sound designer in Hollywood needs to study this film religiously.

The behavior of objects and fluids in microgravity is moderately well-handled too, although I’m not convinced the fire in the ISS would spread as quickly as shown, since fires in space tend to snuff themselves out with no convection to carry away the carbon dioxide buildup. But there were glimpses of what seemed like ruptured gas canisters spewing blue flame, so maybe they were oxygen canisters feeding the fire? I also wasn’t convinced by the scene where Bullock’s character wept and the tears sort of rolled away from her eyes and drifted off. I think surface tension would cause the tears to cling around her eyes unless she brushed them away.

One thing that both films handle quite realistically is the coolness of trained professionals in a crisis. In both Europa Report and Gravity, for the most part the astronauts keep a calm and level tone of voice as they report their crises. In real life, professionals generally don’t get all shouty and dramatic when bad things happen, but they fall back on procedure and training and discipline and rely on those things to see them through. And that’s what we mostly get in both these movies, although Sandra Bullock’s character in Gravity has more panicky moments because she’s not as well-trained as the other astronauts. I’m not sure it’s entirely plausible that they would’ve let her go into space without sufficient training to accustom her to it, but it’s balanced by Clooney’s calm under pressure.

However… all that realism of detail in Gravity masks the fact that the basic premise of the movie requires fudging quite a bit about the physics, dimensions, and probabilities of orbital spaceflight. The crisis begins when an accidental satellite explosion starts a chain reaction that knocks out all the other satellites and creates a huge debris storm that tears apart the space shuttle and later endangers the ISS. Now, yes, true, orbital debris poses a serious risk of impact, but we’re still talking about small bits spread out over a vast volume. In all probability a shuttle or station would be hit by maybe one large piece of debris at most, not this huge oncoming swarm tearing the whole thing to pieces. And the probability of the same thing happening to two structures as a result of the same debris swarm? Much, much tinier. Not to mention that I really, really doubt the fragments as shown could impart enough kinetic energy to these spacecraft to knock them into the kind of spins we see. It’s all very exaggerated for the sake of spectacle. And by the climactic minutes of the film it’s starting to feel a bit repetitive and ridiculous that everything just keeps going so consistently wrong over and over. (The film also simplifies orbital mechanics a great deal, suggesting you can catch up with another orbiting craft just by pointing directly at it and thrusting forward. Since you and it are already moving very fast on curved paths, it’s really not that simple.)

Gravity has a huge edge over Europa Report in its budget and thus its ability to portray microgravity; I wish ER had been able to use this level of technology to simulate Europa’s 0.134g in its surface scenes. But as impressive as Gravity‘s commitment to realism is in some respects, it’s ultimately a far shallower film than ER and cheats the physics in much bigger ways for the sake of contrived action and danger. It’s essentially a big dumb disaster movie disguised with a brilliantly executed veneer of naturalism. Gravity has the style, while Europa Report has the substance.

Now what we need is for someone to put the two together, and we could really be onto something.

Advertisements
  1. Sho
    November 12, 2013 at 7:16 pm

    Next on your watchlist could be: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1709143/

    My problem with both Europa Report and Last Days is their pessimism and exploration phobia – they’re both content to reduce the alien life we encounter to wanting to seemingly mindlessly kill us.

    • November 12, 2013 at 7:59 pm

      I saw no phobia in the film. Yes, there was danger there, just as many forms of animal life on Earth are predatory, but that doesn’t make them evil, and it doesn’t mean science is wrong to seek them out and investigate them. I felt the film made that point very clearly. What mattered most to the characters was not escaping, but informing humanity of what they’d found.

    • November 13, 2013 at 11:20 am

      But like I said, it’s all a matter of attitude. What I like about Europa Report is the way it subverts its own formula-horror structure by embracing the wonder of discovery, the principle that explorers are willing to sacrifice themselves for the sake of knowledge — that space travel is worth it even when things go terribly wrong. As Captain Kirk said, “Risk is our business.” And sometimes risk means loss — but the benefits to humanity can be worth those sacrifices, as long as they’re made by people who choose to go out there and put themselves on the line. I don’t see any pessimism in Europa Report. I think that’s profoundly misreading the film. The message at the end is a very optimistic one, that what these people did was worth it because it changes our view of the universe forever. It’s not a tragedy but a bittersweet triumph. We will build on the knowledge they gave us and discover new wonders, and we will take precautions so that we can explore the frontier more safely.

      I’m reminded of the original The Fly. There are so many sci-fi horror movies that take the stance that “There Are Things Man Was Not Meant to Know” and that when the scientist characters die, it’s the universe inflicting righteous punishment for their hubris in daring to expand knowledge rather than cower in a cave forever. I hate movies like that. But even though The Fly has a similar outcome to those other movies, it’s the film’s attitude that makes all the difference. The message isn’t that the protagonist was punished for his sins, but that he was a courageous pioneer who sacrificed himself for a noble cause, the expansion of human knowledge. It’s optimistic because it ends with the implication that his work will be built on by others and will eventually lead to benefits for humanity, and that we’ll owe it all to the courage and sacrifice of the film’s hero. Europa Report had the same tone, the same message. It’s not portraying exploration as something to be feared, but as something that’s worth the risk.

  2. Sho
    November 13, 2013 at 10:53 am

    Perhaps my reaction is explained by seeing the two films within only a few days of each other, and being frustrated over seeing two films imagine very similar outcomes for exploration missions in short order. I’m leveling the phobia thing more against the creatives, or perhaps just a perceived general attitude that gives rise to telling such stories rather than others. You’re right that the characters in Europa Report react fairly scientifically.

  3. November 20, 2013 at 10:37 pm

    Based on that argument, I’m going to give serious consideration to buying/renting the DVD for Europa Report.

  4. November 23, 2013 at 3:06 am

    I’m blind in one eye so normally those few times I go to a 3D movie, my wife likes them so I go with her sometimes, I’m not going to get a 3D movie but what I do get is a dark and blurry movie. For example, Pacific Rim I couldn’t tell what was going on in some of the fights. With Gravity I think this was the first time I saw 3D movie that looked like I was watching a normal movie if that makes any sense. Aside from that Gravity is one of my favorite movies of the year. Yeah, just a disaster movie in space but seemed realistic, well except for the part where the US seems to have an actual space program, and good acting. It just worked for me.

    I missed Europa Report when it was playing in one of the local art houses but I see it’s on Netflix so I’ll be watching it soon.

  5. Troy
    November 25, 2013 at 12:25 am

    Christopher, Have you ever thought of doing a review of Logan Run’s (either the movie) or the short lived 1 season series? I’d love to hear what you have to say, since it sorta takes place around ST: TMP came out (perhaps Logan came out a couple of years before hand, but it in the ball park.

    • November 25, 2013 at 8:37 am

      I’m not really that interested in revisiting either version of that. The movie was kind of a mess, especially its incoherent climax, and the series was pretty weak from what I recall.

  6. troy
    November 25, 2013 at 10:29 pm

    Yeah, you are right Christopher, Logan Run’s is sorta a hot mess, but as it came out around the same time as Star Wars, . I thought the movie was cutting edge (well cutting edge to a 8 year old at the time). The short lived series actually had DC Fontana & Harlan Ellison contributing to a few episodes. Well…if you ever need something to do, I hope you would reconsider reviewing the movie since I enjoy reading your stuff. — Troy.

  1. June 25, 2014 at 5:59 pm
  2. September 7, 2017 at 9:28 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: